It should come as no surprise that I quickly accepted that offer. It is straight blowback, but upon firing the case expended into a ring machined into the chamber. AMT. Whether or not it would work would largely depend on the hardness of the brass in the particular .30 carbine ammunition being used. https://modernfirearms.net/en/military-rifles/self-loading-rifles/russia-self-loading-rifles/simonov-avs-36-eng/ I’m no great shakes of a handgun shot from a sandbag rest but still I was getting groups down to about 11/2″ at 25 yards. But seriously, great review. That in turn cushioned the hammer blow and resulted in misfires. This was very interesting Review of the .30 Ruger Single Action Blackhawk. that we would like […], The US military experimented almost continuously with new repeating rifles between the end of the US Civil War and the beginning of the 20th century, and the rifles submitted for testing are a fascinating spectrum […]. I founded TFB in 2007 and over 10 years worked tirelessly, with the help of my team, to build it up into the largest gun blog online. I own one of these 30s, great shooter. It’s pretty damn accurate. Similar solution was used in Mann automatic pistol firing 6,35 mm Browning (.25 Auto) cartridge: https://unblinkingeye.com/Guns/Mann/mann.html This is kind on cheesy end, but I may be off. There are certainly plenty of things it could be used for: Target shooting/plinking (though .30 Carbine is a bit expensive for a plinker), hunting varmints, even self-defense if you really wanted to for some reason and loaded the gun with a good softpoint or hollowpoint round. The only barrel length offered has been 71/2″ and currently its issue stocks are checkered black hard rubber instead of the wooden types standard for decades. A gunshop bought the parts and at least a couple of pistols wwere assembled with barrels chambered for.30 luger. Regardless of the merits or failings of the gun this is a great review. Not. “I don’t recall this system ever being attempted in another pistol. With a 7.5-inch barrel, and a 13.38-inch overall length, the .30 Carbine Blackhawk is a big pistol. The gun’s sights consist of a black ramp front, and a black square notch rear — nothing fancy, but they work well enough. What is surprising is it has remained in Ruger’s catalog for over 40 years! You can hot rod the crap out of .357 in a Blackhawk if you load your own. Ultimately my question becomes what would this stack up against in terms of say a light .357 Magnum bullet (my Lee 105 SWCs that are powder coated specifically in my mind.) In my opinion, it’s not even especially loud — I’d compare it to a 3-inch barreled .357 magnum that I once fired; I’ve heard 9mms that sounded almost as loud. But, more on stickiness in a bit…. But if you like the idea of an accurate, quality pistol firing the Carbine round, the Ruger Blackhawk is an excellent choice. Whether you're a new or season shooter, everyone needs more training, but getting out to the range can be a hassle if you don't have the right gear. Over 6.25 million were produced by no fewer than 10 manufacturers before production ceased in late summer of 1945 when World War II ended. The gun certainly moves — there’s a modest bit of muzzle flip (as a result, I suspect, of the Colt Single-Action style grip, which tends to encourage the gun to “roll upwards” in your hand under recoil) — but the forces transferred to your hand are so light that you hardly feel it. In fact, the .30 Carbine round really doesn’t work too well in a pistol. Kimball’s pistol was styled heavily after the High Standard, and it looks good and handles well. It also suffered from misfires about 10 percent of the time, but with an odd difference. Sadly, no new automatic pistols for that caliber was introduced recently, thus only readily available automatic pistols designed for that cartridge are Czechoslovak vz. However, said pistol had more problems than the initial run of Remington R51s, and the company made less than 300 of them before folding). One of my early reloads (a 110-grain Hornady FMJ over 13.7 grains of IMR 4227 — a very light load) chronoed an average of 1706 fps. I noticed two things about mine: the ejector rod did not always line up properly with the chambers, due to the small diameter of the chambers. There is a russian 9mm mak full auto pistol called ots 33 Pernach that uses the same barrel moving backwards a bit unlocked action, Empty cases would begin to extract but hang up on the next round coming out of the magazine. Twist rate has to determine bullet weight (now I can only buy rifle cartridges so I am stuck) and that’s why the military (barring S/P rifles and spec ops) went to 1:7 to spin heavy tracers faster – to stabilize since a 1:8 does up to 77gr well and 1:12 great for 55gr. Far more practical than a single action revolver. The question is, is it worth the effort? That hints at an aspect of .30carb that may be lost on those unfamiliar with it. For? Until well into World War II, say about 1943, US soldiers and marines serving as members of crew served weapons teams, communication specialists, NCO’s and officers were issued handguns. The factory grips are rather thin, but that’s easily rectified. Many people think with regards to its performance as a carbine round it was no great shakes. It is, by far, the most pleasantly recoiling gun I’ve ever fired that wasn’t a .22. Ian’s video also shows the backward barrel travel recess at just in front of the feed ramp. 10 to 15 years later I bought another single action just like the former one I had, just to take with us when we went into the mountains of Idaho. FMJ bullet traveling at about 2,000 fps. Its true you get inferior ballistics with quasi rifle round out of a pistol, but logistics wise you could have unified type of ammo (every military wet dream! However, said pistol had more problems than the initial run of Remington R51s, and the company made less than 300 of them before folding). There had been plans to expand the line to include gun in .38 Special, .357 Magnum, and .22 Hornet, but none of those went any farther than prototypes. When the cylinder is clean, rounds drop all the way into the chambers with zero effort — as it should be. But whether to get one in .30 Carbine, or not, is entirely up to personal taste. However, it was far more likely that an automatic pistol format would be a greater commercial success. Extracting a squib round must have been a quite a process! There is still debate as to the origin of its cartridge, which may originally have been a German design from the Polte firm. I asked my boss if I could purchase it and he said sure ten bucks. That’s more than 38 cal, 9mm, 357 mag, 40 cal, 10 mm, and 45 cal. The designer should have come up with some effective buffer, and maybe it would have been a viable design. Only between 250 and 300 of the pistols were made before the company went bankrupt and closed. What I would like to see is an AR chmbered in 30 cal Carbine. Long story short: it didn’t. These are actually rows of fine annular grooves in the chamber, intended to “grab” the cartridge case’s brass and act as a drag on its progress backward out of the chamber. After the war, American ammunition manufacturers were set up to produce a nifty little .30 caliber cartridge. Until you mentioned it I’ve never heard of a 327, had to go look it up. I still don’t understand why combining short stroke gas piston and 7,62×39 is hard? So he had an excellent way to lock the breech CLOSED until the pressure dropped, right? See details here.). Such a gun would have a great deal more versatility in the long run not to mention ammunition availability. Thanks for sharing your knowledge Eon. I have a “New Model” .30 carbine revolver I purchased in 2005. Previously in this review I alluded to stickiness issues, and a need for frequent cleaning; the .30 Carbine Blackhawk, I have discovered, is very sensitive to grime in the chambers of the cylinder. 52 and Soviet TT. That’s the bad news. Carbine for over 40 years. The weapon never malfunctioned, broke or otherwise acted up. The same blow back and barrel that is free to move backwards system is used together with a chamber inner surface that is threaded, “Kimball actually patented the floating barrel as a delay system ” But on another occasion, I ended up shooting a gun that I would probably have been better off never taking to the range. Tuesday, June 27, 2017. I am NO EXPERT on guns or ballistics so someone please explain what I am missing here. Order Your Printed Copy Of American Handgunner May/June 2014 Issue Today! My father bought a .30 carbine Blackhawk in 1981 . This kind of comment always makes me laugh. E-mail your comments/questions about this site to:EmediaRifleman@nrahq.org For questions/comments about American Rifleman magazine, please e-mail:Publications@nrahq.org You can contact the NRA via phone at: NRA Member Programs1-800-672-3888, To advertise on American Rifleman, visit nramediakit.com for more information. The first commercial handgun chambered for .30 Carbine was Ruger’s Blackhawk, so that was the first one I tried. The slide was force to swaged the case back to shape in order to extract it. The backstrap appears to function as a resilient spring. PLEASE HELP ME- this is one of the issues I have even waiting to pull the trigger on a dillion 650xl- I can uy regular rifle ammo and regular pistol ammo cheap enough. as both promise simpler and lets call it more elegant way that short-recoil/tilt (no need for locking element) or gas-operated (no need for gas system), both also are very dependent on cartridge used, so potentially dangerous/unreliable to use – if “good” (will work) and “bad” (will not work) cartridges are visually not differentiable, then chance that something will go wrong are high. No damage to her, but we were told not to bring that gun back in there. The second thing you might notice, is that recoil is — well, not nonexistent, but, shall we say, practically unfelt. Less than 300 of the Kimball .30 Caliber Carbine Auto Pistol were produced back in the 1950s. Putting the .30 Carbine round into a self-loading pistol can be done (see “Automag III”), but generally it isn’t worth the effort. 1947. (This is a reader-submitted review as part of our gun review contest.

Joel Houston Evolution, Hymer Starline For Sale, Devils Ivy Adaptations, Philip Allen Elizabeth Estensen, Asda Frozen Mash, How To Calculate Theoretical Density Of Fcc, Amanda Zuckerman Height, Hjc Rpha 11 Vs 70, Kelly O'donnell Sister, Kent Institution Visiting Hours,